ALTOONA, Pa. (WTAJ) — The Dean Patterson Little League World Series kicked off yesterday in Altoona. Envision a school making its very first trip to the land where dreams come true, tasked with trying to knock off the nation's top ranked team and hands down favorite to claim the crown. The National Championship Series is an All-Southeastern Conference affair pitting #3 National Seed Florida against #4 National Seed LSU for the title. WOLVES HOLD OFF JOHNNY'S PIZZA SHOP, 11-10, IN 64TH ELLWOOD CITY LITTLE LEAGUE TITLE OPENER. On this day, he is a son following in the footsteps of his father. Success is never easy to attain, sustained success even more difficult. His company owns copyrights or options on 14 television projects and 22 screenplays. 9th overall CWS Trip for Arkansas, 5th under Dave Van Horn.
Little League World Series Past Champions
John Franus led Wampum General Store with a home run, double and single. Fans and players across multiple generations have long transformed this midwestern city into the premier college baseball destination for a couple of weeks each summer. Donavin Chambers led the Wolves with three singles. They almost always share an extended embrace at the end of the journey, no matter the outcome. Ellwood City reached the Little League World Series Pennsylvania State Championship Tournament. TCU has never played in the National Championship Series. Jim Smith threw a complete-game victory and had a triple and single at the plate. Matt Olayer doubled and singled to lead Mom's Pies. The win tied the best-of-three series at one-game apiece. Andrew DeMase followed with a line drive that was speared by Steve Lodovico and turned into an inning-ending double play. The Gators played Texas for the title in 2005 and appeared again in 2011, losing to SEC East rival South Carolina. The runers pulled a double steal and scored on Hampon's single to take a 2-0 lead. Coughlin reached on an infield single and Joe Mancini reached on a bunt single.
Dean Patterson Little World Series 3
They stand as a reminder that so much of what happens here transcends the game. Michigan's Eric Bakich also has personal connections. 1 innings and Jon Link picked up his 6th save with a perfect 9th. Cucunato led the Moose with a triple, double, single and scored three runs. FRISCO DEFEATS WAYNE, 7-2, BEHIND ARM, BAT OF CHRISTIE TO WIN 22ND ELLWOOD CITY LITTLE LEAGUE CHAMPIONSHIP. Afterward, he sneaked backstage, and the stage manager, thinking he was part of the show, asked if he'd like to be an extra in "Aida.
Past Little League World Series
With the bases loaded and two outs, the defensive play of the game was made when Travis St. Clair snagged a line drive off the bat of Anthony Punzell to turn a possible extra base hit into the final out of the inning. If two games are played on Saturday they will begin at 3PM & 8PM ET. This much is known for sure…. Rotary rallied for eight runs in the third inning to defeat Blackwood's 12-9 victory to win the 43rd Ellwood City Little League Championship at Freidhoff Field. Only the unfolding story across the next month of baseball will reveal if Omaha's streets will once again be filled with heels of tar and rivers of black and orange. The Elks defeated the Moose, 2-1, to win the second-half crown.
Dean Patterson Little World Series Streaming
He believed that mission would unite the diocese, not issues. ELKS EDGE LEGION, 1-0, BEHIND COUGHLIN TO WIN ELLWOOD CITY LITTLE LEAGUE AMERICAN LEAGUE CROWN. The Great Lakes and Lone Star states are paired up again in Omaha. Minor League Player of the Day – Red Patterson - 8 IP, 0 Runs, 3 Hits, 7 K's. The relay throw to home was errant and Biega crossed home plate to give Chewton the 10-9 victory. Josh Williams allowed one hit in 1-2/3 innings of relief. Rick Coughlin led the Elks with a two-run homer, a three-run double and a single with five RBI. Wehman's two-run single gave the Wolves the winning 5-3 margin. Oregon State was completing a back to back run to national titles at the old yard in Omaha. Tim Tadlock's crew hails from a little further west in the dusty panhandle town of Lubbock, yet his opening statement in the pre-series press conference echoed these very same sentiments.
Dean Patterson Little World Series 7
Winning pitcher Williams threw a four-hitter and fanned nine batters. Defeated Mississippi State 2 Games To 0 in Starkville. The long-time Florida State head coach doesn't need it for his role in the history and growth of the sport to be set in stone, but that doesn't make him want it any less. The club was firmly in the driver's seat on their side of the bracket before eventual champion Oregon State knocked them from that perch en route to the title. Finally, and as a result of the strategic plan, the Diocese of Dallas emerged as a leader in church planting and congregational development in the Episcopal Church. Dave Schweinsburg smacked a home run in the bottom of the eighth inning to lift the Moose to a 1-0 win over the Elks to win the 6th Ellwood City Little League Championship at Ewing Park. On Saturday, May 16, 2015, the Rev. Tony DeLisio led the Moose with three hits and two home runs. Murray led the American Legion with a homer, single and three RBI. Outstanding plays by both teams proved to be a key factor throughout the game. The Previous Meeting: - The teams last met in late March for an SEC weekend series in Gainesville, FL.
Dean Patterson Little World Series
In perhaps the strongest Omaha related connection, McDonnell and first year Mississippi State head coach Chris Lemonis were teammates on The Citadel's 1990 College World Series squad. Patterson wins title over familiar foe. John Lutz added three singles and Bob Nocera two singles. Behind the bat of Nick Cucunato, the Moose downed Evans, 8-6, in the 42nd Ellwood City Little League Championship Series at Freidhoff Field. Luke Angelucci followed with a bases-clearing double to increase the lead to 8-1.
Now consider that none other that same outfielder, Steven Williams secured his own walk-off home run to complete the miracle comeback which eventually propelled Auburn to the championship of the Atlanta Regional. With the base loaded, Jason Montgomery belted an opposite-field grand slam to take an 8-4 lead. THE HUNGRY SURVIVOR. While the above statement may be telling in relation to how his club pulled off one of the premier upsets in CWS history, the sentiments that followed revealed much more. For three General Conventions the Episcopal Church had been focusing inwardly on the rituals to be permitted or disallowed in her churches. The Wolves took the lead in the top of the second inning witha three-run rally.
Dave Melfi followed with a triple into the right-field corner scoring Costa and Aquino to tie the score at 3-3. CUCUNATO LEADS MOOSE OVER EVANS. Andrews led Rotary with two home runs. Oregon State and Florida are in the driver's seat of their respective brackets. It should also be noted the Coastal's starting pitcher Andrew Beckwith deserves just as much credit for the main storyline of the tournament thus far. Somewhere in between, he managed to be selected by the Chicago Cubs in the third round of the MLB draft. Winning pitcher Fidell and reliever Marshall allowed three hits.
Although the definition of "driving" is indisputably broadened by the inclusion in § 11-114 of the words "operate, move, or be in actual physical control, " the statute nonetheless relates to driving while intoxicated. 2d 701, 703 () (citing State v. Purcell, 336 A. See Jackson, 443 U. at 319, 99 at 2789, 61 at 573; Tichnell, 287 Md. The court said: "An intoxicated person seated behind the steering wheel of an automobile is a threat to the safety and welfare of the public. Comm'r, 425 N. Mr. robinson was quite ill recently wrote. 2d 370 (N. 1988), in turn quoting Martin v. Commissioner of Public Safety, 358 N. 2d 734, 737 ()); see also Berger v. District of Columbia, 597 A. For example, on facts much akin to those of the instant case, the Supreme Court of Wyoming held that a defendant who was found unconscious in his vehicle parked some twenty feet off the highway with the engine off, the lights off, and the key in the ignition but off, was in "actual physical control" of the vehicle.
Mr. Robinson Was Quite Ill Recently Announced
Webster's also defines "control" as "to exercise restraining or directing influence over. " The court reached this conclusion based on its belief that "it is reasonable to allow a driver, when he believes his driving is impaired, to pull completely off the highway, turn the key off and sleep until he is sober, without fear of being arrested for being in control. " Indeed, once an individual has started the vehicle, he or she has come as close as possible to actually driving without doing so and will generally be in "actual physical control" of the vehicle. The court concluded that "while the defendant remained behind the wheel of the truck, the pulling off to the side of the road and turning off the ignition indicate that defendant voluntarily ceased to exercise control over the vehicle prior to losing consciousness, " and it reversed his conviction. Mr. robinson was quite ill recently passed. Further, when interpreting a statute, we assume that the words of the statute have their ordinary and natural meaning, absent some indication to the contrary. Many of our sister courts have struggled with determining the exact breadth of conduct described by "actual physical control" of a motor vehicle, reaching varied results. Superior Court for Greenlee County, 153 Ariz. 119, 735 P. 2d 149, 152 (). A person may also be convicted under § 21-902 if it can be determined beyond a reasonable doubt that before being apprehended he or she has actually driven, operated, or moved the vehicle while under the influence.
2d 1144, 1147 (Ala. 1986). In those rare instances where the facts show that a defendant was furthering the goal of safer highways by voluntarily 'sleeping it off' in his vehicle, and that he had no intent of moving the vehicle, trial courts should be allowed to find that the defendant was not 'in actual physical control' of the vehicle.... ". In the words of a dissenting South Dakota judge, this construction effectively creates a new crime, "Parked While Intoxicated. " The policy of allowing an intoxicated individual to "sleep it off" in safety, rather than attempt to drive home, arguably need not encompass the privilege of starting the engine, whether for the sake of running the radio, air conditioning, or heater. V. Sandefur, 300 Md. Id., 136 Ariz. 2d at 459. We believe it would be preferable, and in line with legislative intent and social policy, to read more flexibility into [prior precedent]. What constitutes "actual physical control" will inevitably depend on the facts of the individual case. Petersen v. Department of Public Safety, 373 N. 2d 38, 40 (S. 1985) (Henderson, J., dissenting). Mr. robinson was quite ill recently played most played. A vehicle that is operable to some extent. In Garcia, the court held that the defendant was in "actual physical control" and not a "passive occupant" when he was apprehended while in the process of turning the key to start the vehicle. More recently, the Alabama Supreme Court abandoned this strict, three-pronged test, adopting instead a "totality of the circumstances test" and reducing the test's three prongs to "factors to be considered. "
Mr. Robinson Was Quite Ill Recently Built
In the instant case, stipulations that Atkinson was in the driver's seat and the keys were in the ignition were strong factors indicating he was in "actual physical control. " Emphasis in original). As long as such individuals do not act to endanger themselves or others, they do not present the hazard to which the drunk driving statute is directed. 2d 407, 409 (D. C. 1991) (stating in dictum that "[e]ven a drunk with the ignition keys in his pocket would be deemed sufficiently in control of the vehicle to warrant conviction. Thus, our construction of "actual physical control" as permitting motorists to "sleep it off" should not be misconstrued as encouraging motorists to try their luck on the roadways, knowing they can escape arrest by subsequently placing their vehicles "away from the road pavement, outside regular traffic lanes, and... turn[ing] off the ignition so that the vehicle's engine is not running. " As for the General Assembly's addition of the term "actual physical control" in 1969, we note that it is a generally accepted principle of statutory construction that a statute is to be read so that no word or phrase is "rendered surplusage, superfluous, meaningless, or nugatory. " Because of the varying tests and the myriad factual permutations, synthesizing or summarizing the opinions of other courts appears futile. Other factors may militate against a court's determination on this point, however. As long as a person is physically or bodily able to assert dominion in the sense of movement by starting the car and driving away, then he has substantially as much control over the vehicle as he would if he were actually driving it.
It is "being in the driver's position of the motor vehicle with the motor running or with the motor vehicle moving. " Webster's also contrasts "actual" with "potential and possible" as well as with "hypothetical. The location of the vehicle can be a determinative factor in the inquiry because a person whose vehicle is parked illegally or stopped in the roadway is obligated by law to move the vehicle, and because of this obligation could more readily be deemed in "actual physical control" than a person lawfully parked on the shoulder or on his or her own property. In People v. Cummings, 176 293, 125 514, 517, 530 N. 2d 672, 675 (1988), the Illinois Court of Appeals also rejected a reading of "actual physical control" which would have prohibited intoxicated persons from entering their vehicles to "sleep it off. " Idaho Code § 18- 8002(7) (1987 & 1991); Matter of Clayton, 113 Idaho 817, 748 P. 2d 401, 403 (1988). Rather, each must be considered with an eye towards whether there is in fact present or imminent exercise of control over the vehicle or, instead, whether the vehicle is merely being used as a stationary shelter. Position of the person charged in the driver's seat, behind the steering wheel, and in such condition that, except for the intoxication, he or she is physically capable of starting the engine and causing the vehicle to move; 3. No one factor alone will necessarily be dispositive of whether the defendant was in "actual physical control" of the vehicle.
Mr. Robinson Was Quite Ill Recently Wrote
We believe that the General Assembly, particularly by including the word "actual" in the term "actual physical control, " meant something more than merely sleeping in a legally parked vehicle with the ignition off. Denied, 429 U. S. 1104, 97 1131, 51 554 (1977). Id., 25 Utah 2d 404, 483 P. 2d at 443 (citations omitted and emphasis in original). One can discern a clear view among a few states, for example, that "the purpose of the 'actual physical control' offense is [as] a preventive measure, " State v. Schuler, 243 N. W. 2d 367, 370 (N. D. 1976), and that " 'an intoxicated person seated behind the steering wheel of a motor vehicle is a threat to the safety and welfare of the public. ' Key v. Town of Kinsey, 424 So. In Zavala, an officer discovered the defendant sitting unconscious in the driver's seat of his truck, with the key in the ignition, but off. And while we can say that such people should have stayed sober or planned better, that does not realistically resolve this all-too-frequent predicament. For the intoxicated person caught between using his vehicle for shelter until he is sober or using it to drive home, [prior precedent] encourages him to attempt to quickly drive home, rather than to sleep it off in the car, where he will be a beacon to police. Webster's Third New International Dictionary 1706 (1986) defines "physical" as "relating to the body... often opposed to mental. " We believe no such crime exists in Maryland. What may be an unduly broad extension of this "sleep it off" policy can be found in the Arizona Supreme Court's Zavala v. State, 136 Ariz. 356, 666 P. 2d 456 (1983), which not only encouraged a driver to "sleep it off" before attempting to drive, but also could be read as encouraging drivers already driving to pull over and sleep.
Active or constructive possession of the vehicle's ignition key by the person charged or, in the alternative, proof that such a key is not required for the vehicle's operation; 2. Even the presence of such a statutory definition has failed to settle the matter, however. The engine was off, although there was no indication as to whether the keys were in the ignition or not. Neither the statute's purpose nor its plain language supports the result that intoxicated persons sitting in their vehicles while in possession of their ignition keys would, regardless of other circumstances, always be subject to criminal penalty. Balanced against these facts were the circumstances that the vehicle was legally parked, the ignition was off, and Atkinson was fast asleep.
Mr. Robinson Was Quite Ill Recently Passed
Those were the facts in the Court of Special Appeals' decision in Gore v. State, 74 143, 536 A. In this instance, the context is the legislature's desire to prevent intoxicated individuals from posing a serious public risk with their vehicles. Perhaps the strongest factor informing this inquiry is whether there is evidence that the defendant started or attempted to start the vehicle's engine. As we have already said with respect to the legislature's 1969 addition of "actual physical control" to the statute, we will not read a statute to render any word superfluous or meaningless. Courts pursuing this deterrence-based policy generally adopt an extremely broad view of "actual physical control. " Adams v. State, 697 P. 2d 622, 625 (Wyo. By using the word "actual, " the legislature implied a current or imminent restraining or directing influence over a vehicle. The court said: "We can expect that most people realize, as they leave a tavern or party intoxicated, that they face serious sanctions if they drive.
Richmond v. State, 326 Md. Quoting Hughes v. State, 535 P. 2d 1023, 1024 ()) (both cases involved defendant seated behind the steering wheel of vehicle parked partially in the roadway with the key in the ignition). See, e. g., State v. Woolf, 120 Idaho 21, 813 P. 2d 360, 362 () (court upheld magistrate's determination that defendant was in driver's position when lower half of defendant's body was on the driver's side of the front seat, his upper half resting across the passenger side). 2d 735 (1988), discussed supra, where the court concluded that evidence of the ignition key in the "on" position, the glowing alternator/battery light, the gear selector in "drive, " and the warm engine, sufficiently supported a finding that the defendant had actually driven his car shortly before the officer's arrival. Thus, rather than assume that a hazard exists based solely upon the defendant's presence in the vehicle, we believe courts must assess potential danger based upon the circumstances of each case.
Mr. Robinson Was Quite Ill Recently Played Most Played
2d 483, 485-86 (1992). This view appears to stem from the belief that " '[a]n intoxicated person in a motor vehicle poses a threat to public safety because he "might set out on an inebriated journey at any moment. " State v. Ghylin, 250 N. 2d 252, 255 (N. 1977). In State v. Bugger, 25 Utah 2d 404, 483 P. 2d 442 (1971), the defendant was discovered asleep in his automobile which was parked on the shoulder of the road, completely off the travel portion of the highway. We therefore join other courts which have rejected an inflexible test that would make criminals of all people who sit intoxicated in a vehicle while in possession of the vehicle's ignition keys, without regard to the surrounding circumstances.
Accordingly, the words "actual physical control, " particularly when added by the legislature in the disjunctive, indicate an intent to encompass activity different than, and presumably broader than, driving, operating, or moving the vehicle. We do not believe the legislature meant to forbid those intoxicated individuals who emerge from a tavern at closing time on a cold winter night from merely entering their vehicles to seek shelter while they sleep off the effects of alcohol. We believe that, by using the term "actual physical control, " the legislature intended to differentiate between those inebriated people who represent no threat to the public because they are only using their vehicles as shelters until they are sober enough to drive and those people who represent an imminent threat to the public by reason of their control of a vehicle. This view, at least insofar as it excuses a drunk driver who was already driving but who subsequently relinquishes control, might be subject to criticism as encouraging drunk drivers to test their skills by attempting first to drive before concluding that they had better not. At least one state, Idaho, has a statutory definition of "actual physical control. " We have no such contrary indications here, so we examine the ordinary meaning of "actual physical control. " 3] We disagree with this construction of "actual physical control, " which we consider overly broad and excessively rigid. The Supreme Court of Ohio, for example, defined "actual physical control" as requiring that "a person be in the driver's seat of a vehicle, behind the steering wheel, in possession of the ignition key, and in such condition that he is physically capable of starting the engine and causing the vehicle to move. " City of Cincinnati v. Kelley, 47 Ohio St. 2d 94, 351 N. E. 2d 85, 87- 88 (1976) (footnote omitted), cert. Courts must in each case examine what the evidence showed the defendant was doing or had done, and whether these actions posed an imminent threat to the public. FN6] Still, some generalizations are valid. When the occupant is totally passive, has not in any way attempted to actively control the vehicle, and there is no reason to believe that the inebriated person is imminently going to control the vehicle in his or her condition, we do not believe that the legislature intended for criminal sanctions to apply. The question, of course, is "How much broader? As a practical matter, we recognize that any definition of "actual physical control, " no matter how carefully considered, cannot aspire to cover every one of the many factual variations that one may envision.
The inquiry must always take into account a number of factors, however, including the following: 1) whether or not the vehicle's engine is running, or the ignition on; 2) where and in what position the person is found in the vehicle; 3) whether the person is awake or asleep; 4) where the vehicle's ignition key is located; 5) whether the vehicle's headlights are on; 6) whether the vehicle is located in the roadway or is legally parked. While the preferred response would be for such people either to find alternate means of getting home or to remain at the tavern or party without getting behind the wheel until sober, this is not always done. Accordingly, a person is in "actual physical control" if the person is presently exercising or is imminently likely to exercise "restraining or directing influence" over a motor vehicle while in an intoxicated condition.